<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Lylo Files &#187; portfolio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lylo.co.uk/category/portfolio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lylo.co.uk</link>
	<description>Not very much at all, really</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:56:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>WhistleBump Redesign</title>
		<link>http://blog.lylo.co.uk/2005/10/01/whistlebump-redesign/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lylo.co.uk/2005/10/01/whistlebump-redesign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2005 08:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Olly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[portfolio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lylo.co.uk/blog/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven't been particularly kind to the WhistleBump site over the past few years.  It was aways hurriedly knocked together at the eleventh hour and has suffered slightly as a result.  Rather frayed around the edges, it was (in my eyes at least) the online equivalent of an amateur DIY botch job (sorry Simon).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="200" title="Screenshot of the WhistleBump site" alt="Screenshot of the WhistleBump site" style="margin: 0pt 7px 2px 0pt; float: left" src="http://www.lylo.co.uk/image/bump-shot.gif" /></p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t been particularly kind to the WhistleBump site over the past few years.  It was aways hurriedly knocked together at the eleventh hour and has suffered slightly as a result.  Rather frayed around the edges, it was (in my eyes at least) the online equivalent of an amateur DIY botch job (sorry Simon).</p>
<p>Good news, then, that the recent <a href="http://www.whistlebump.co.uk">WhistleBump redesign</a> was completed from concept to delivery in a little under five days  :)</p>
<p>Self-deprecating jokes aside, the redesign was well planned and executed.  After the screen mock-ups were approved, the site content was written using <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/">XHTML 1.1</a> and the presentation in CSS.  Purists would undoubtably comment on the implementation of the prevalent rounded boxes, and I agree that there are methods which produce <em>slightly</em> less HTML, but given the time contraints which were imposed, we decided to go with our tried and trusted method of providing fluid rounded boxes.  I think they work well.</p>
<p>The original brief was to produce a fittingly <a href="http://www.andwedanced.com/venues/pgarage.htm">&#8220;disco&#8221;</a> look for one of London&#8217;s best-loved club nights, and the feedback has been very positive.  Perhaps the biggest complaint was for the choice of white text on black background, an allegedly frowned upon design no-no.  Personal taste I guess, but it works for me and for the client, so I&#8217;m happy.</p>
<p>And what are rules there for if not to be broken?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lylo.co.uk/2005/10/01/whistlebump-redesign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
